1. SawinJL, SverrissonF, LeidreiterA. Renewable energy and sustainable development; 2016. Available from: https://www.worldfuturecouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/WFC_2016_Renewable-Energy-and-Sustainable-Development.pdf. [Last accessed on 4 Jul 2023]
2. NavalpotroP, Castillo-martínezE, Carretero-gonzálezJ. Sustainable materials for off-grid battery applications: advances, challenges and prospects. Sustain Energ Fuels 2021;5:310-31.
3. RahmanA, FarrokO, HaqueMM. Environmental impact of renewable energy source based electrical power plants: solar, wind, hydroelectric, biomass, geothermal, tidal, ocean, and osmotic. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2022;161:112279.
4. DunnB, KamathH, TarasconJM. Electrical energy storage for the grid: a battery of choices. Science 2011;334:928-35.
5. WangW, LuoQ, LiB, WeiX, LiL, YangZ. Recent progress in redox flow battery research and development. Adv Funct Mater 2013;23:970-86.
6. LiG, LouX, PengC, LiuC, ChenW. Interface chemistry for sodium metal anodes/batteries: a review. Chem Synth 2022;2:16.
7. ZhangL, HuX, WangZ, et al. Hybrid electrochemical energy storage systems: an overview for smart grid and electrified vehicle applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2021;139:110581.
8. KebedeAA, KalogiannisT, VanMierlo J, BerecibarM. A comprehensive review of stationary energy storage devices for large scale renewable energy sources grid integration. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2022;159:112213.
9. LiuW, LuW, ZhangH, LiX. Aqueous flow batteries: research and development. Chemistry 2019;25:1649-64.
10. YaoX. Boosting lithium-selenium batteries. Chem Synth 2022;2:10.
11. ThallerLH. Electrically rechargeable redox flow cells. Available from: https://patents.google.com/patent/US3996064A/en [Last accessed on 4 Jul 2023]
12. IwakiriI, AntunesT, AlmeidaH, SousaJP, FigueiraRB, MendesA. Redox flow batteries: materials, design and prospects. Energies 2021;14:5643.
13. ParkM, RyuJ, WangW, ChoJ. Material design and engineering of next-generation flow-battery technologies. Nat Rev Mater 2017:2.
14. KamatPV, SchanzeKS, BuriakJM. Redox flow batteries. ACS Energy Lett 2017;2:1368-9.
15. ChenQ, LvY, YuanZ, et al. Organic electrolytes for pH-neutral aqueous organic redox flow batteries. Adv Mater 2021;32:2108777.
16. LiZ, LuYC. Material design of aqueous redox flow batteries: fundamental challenges and mitigation strategies. Adv Mater 2020;32:e2002132.
17. LuoJ, HuB, HuM, ZhaoY, LiuTL. Status and prospects of organic redox flow batteries toward sustainable energy storage. ACS Energy Lett 2019;4:2220-40.
18. HuskinsonB, MarshakMP, SuhC, et al. A metal-free organic-inorganic aqueous flow battery. Nature 2014;505:195-8.
19. LinK, ChenQ, GerhardtMR, et al. Alkaline quinone flow battery. Science 2015;349:1529-32.
20. FengR, ZhangX, MurugesanV, et al. Reversible ketone hydrogenation and dehydrogenation for aqueous organic redox flow batteries. Science 2021;372:836-40.
21. HuB, DeBrulerC, RhodesZ, LiuTL. Long-cycling aqueous organic redox flow battery (AORFB) toward sustainable and safe energy storage. J Am Chem Soc 2017;139:1207-14.
22. LiuT, WeiX, NieZ, SprenkleV, WangW. A total organic aqueous redox flow battery employing a low cost and sustainable methyl viologen anolyte and 4-HO-TEMPO catholyte. Adv Energy Mater 2016;6:1501449.
23. PanF, WangQ. Redox species of redox flow batteries: a review. Molecules 2015;20:20499-517.
24. CaoJ, TianJ, XuJ, WangY. Organic flow batteries: recent progress and perspectives. Energy Fuels 2020;34:13384-411.
25. KwabiDG, JiY, AzizMJ. Electrolyte lifetime in aqueous organic redox flow batteries: a critical review. Chem Rev 2020;120:6467-89.
26. BehES, DePorcellinis D, GraciaRL, XiaKT, GordonRG, AzizMJ. A neutral pH aqueous organic-organometallic redox flow battery with extremely high capacity retention. ACS Energy Lett 2017;2:639-44.
27. JingY, ZhaoEW, GouletMA, et al. In situ electrochemical recomposition of decomposed redox-active species in aqueous organic flow batteries. Nat Chem 2022;14:1103-9.
28. DebrulerC, HuB, MossJ, et al. Designer two-electron storage viologen anolyte materials for neutral aqueous organic redox flow batteries. Chem 2017;3:961-78.
29. LiH, FanH, HuB, HuL, ChangG, SongJ. Spatial structure regulation: a rod-shaped viologen enables long lifetime in aqueous redox flow batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2021;60:26971-7.
30. HuS, LiT, HuangM, et al. Phenylene-bridged bispyridinium with high capacity and stability for aqueous flow batteries. Adv Mater 2021;33:e2005839.
31. LinK, Gómez-bombarelliR, BehES, et al. A redox-flow battery with an alloxazine-based organic electrolyte. Nat Energy 2016:1.
32. HollasA, WeiX, MurugesanV, et al. A biomimetic high-capacity phenazine-based anolyte for aqueous organic redox flow batteries. Nat Energy 2018;3:508-14.
33. OritaA, VerdeMG, SakaiM, MengYS. A biomimetic redox flow battery based on flavin mononucleotide. Nat Commun 2016;7:13230.
34. LiH, FanH, RavivarmaM, HuB, FengY, SongJ. A stable organic dye catholyte for long-life aqueous flow batteries. Chem Commun 2020;56:13824-7.
35. FanH, ZhangJ, RavivarmaM, et al. Radical charge population and energy: critical role in redox potential and cycling life of piperidine nitroxyl radical cathodes in aqueous zinc hybrid flow batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2020;12:43568-75.
36. HuB, FanH, LiH, RavivarmaM, SongJ. Five-membered ring nitroxide radical: a new class of high-potential, stable catholytes for neutral aqueous organic redox flow batteries. Adv Funct Mater 2021;31:2102734.
37. LiuY, GouletM, TongL, et al. A long-lifetime all-organic aqueous flow battery utilizing TMAP-TEMPO radical. Chem 2019;5:1861-70.
38. FanH, HuB, LiH, RavivarmaM, FengY, SongJ. Conjugate-driven electron density delocalization of piperidine nitroxyl radical for stable aqueous zinc hybrid flow batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2022;61:e202115908.
39. FanH, WuW, RavivarmaM, et al. Mitigating ring-opening to develop stable TEMPO catholytes for pH-neutral all-organic redox flow batteries. Adv Funct Materials 2022;32:2203032.
40. ZuX, ZhangL, QianY, ZhangC, YuG. Molecular engineering of azobenzene-based anolytes towards high-capacity aqueous redox flow batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2020;59:22163-70.
41. PangS, WangX, WangP, JiY. Biomimetic Amino acid functionalized phenazine flow batteries with long lifetime at near-neutral pH. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2021;60:5289-98.
42. XuJ, PangS, WangX, WangP, JiY. Ultrastable aqueous phenazine flow batteries with high capacity operated at elevated temperatures. Joule 2021;5:2437-49.
43. HuangJ, HuS, YuanX, et al. Radical stabilization of a tripyridinium-triazine molecule enables reversible storage of multiple electrons. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2021;60:20921-5.
44. WibergC, EvenäsL, BuschM, AhlbergE. Naphthalene diimides (NDI) in highly stable pH-neutral aqueous organic redox flow batteries. J Electroanal Chem 2021;896:115224.
45. WibergC, OwusuF, WangE, AhlbergE. Electrochemical evaluation of a napthalene diimide derivative for potential application in aqueous organic redox flow batteries. Energy Technol 2019;7:1900843.
46. MedabalmiV, SundararajanM, SinghV, BaikM, ByonHR. Naphthalene diimide as a two-electron anolyte for aqueous and neutral pH redox flow batteries. J Mater Chem A 2020;8:11218-23.
47. PinheiroD, PineiroM, deMelo JSS. Sulfonated tryptanthrin anolyte increases performance in pH neutral aqueous redox flow batteries. Commun Chem 2021;4:89.
48. HuP, LanH, WangX, et al. Renewable-lawsone-based sustainable and high-voltage aqueous flow battery. Energy Storage Mater 2019;19:62-8.
49. LiZ, JiangT, AliM, WuC, ChenW. Recent progress in organic species for redox flow batteries. Energy Storage Mater 2022;50:105-38.
50. JinS, JingY, KwabiDG, et al. A Water-miscible quinone flow battery with high volumetric capacity and energy density. ACS Energy Lett 2019;4:1342-8.
51. JiY, GouletM, PollackDA, et al. A phosphonate-functionalized quinone redox flow battery at near-neutral pH with record capacity retention rate. Adv Energy Mater 2019;9:1900039.
52. HuB, LuoJ, HuM, YuanB, LiuTL. A pH-neutral, metal-free aqueous organic redox flow battery employing an ammonium anthraquinone anolyte. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2019;58:16629-36.
53. ChaiJ, WangX, LashgariA, WilliamsCK, JiangJJ. A pH-neutral, aqueous redox flow battery with a 3,600-cycle lifetime: micellization-enabled high stability and crossover suppression. ChemSusChem 2020;13:4069-77.
54. LeeW, PermatasariA, KwonY. Neutral pH aqueous redox flow batteries using an anthraquinone-ferrocyanide redox couple. J Mater Chem C 2020;8:5727-31.
55. XiaL, HuoW, GaoH, et al. Intramolecular hydrogen bonds induced high solubility for efficient and stable anthraquinone based neutral aqueous organic redox flow batteries. Jops 2021;498:229896.
56. ZhuY, LiY, QianY, et al. Anthraquinone-based anode material for aqueous redox flow batteries operating in nondemanding atmosphere. J Power Sources 2021;501:229984.
57. XiaL, ZhangY, WangF, et al. A low-potential and stable bis-dimethylamino-substituted anthraquinone for ph-neutral aqueous redox flow batteries. ChemElectroChem 2022:9.
58. WinsbergJ, StolzeC, MuenchS, LiedlF, HagerMD, SchubertUS. TEMPO/phenazine combi-molecule: a redox-active material for symmetric aqueous redox-flow batteries. ACS Energy Lett 2016;1:976-80.
59. NambafuGS, SiddharthK, ZhangC, et al. An organic bifunctional redox active material for symmetric aqueous redox flow battery. Nano Energy 2021;89:106422.
60. WeiX, XiaG, KirbyB, et al. An aqueous redox flow battery based on neutral alkali metal ferri/ferrocyanide and polysulfide electrolytes. J Electrochem Soc 2016;163:A5150-3.
61. LongY, XuZ, WangG, et al. A neutral polysulfide/ferricyanide redox flow battery. iScience 2021;24:103157.
62. WibergC, BuschM, EvenäsL, AhlbergE. The electrochemical response of core-functionalized naphthalene Diimides (NDI) - a combined computational and experimental investigation. Electrochimica Acta 2021;367:137480.
